GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] can we stop arguing about appeal until somebody posts a number — 45 comments in the full submission. View in context.
4.1k
c/insurancefights·submitted 1 year ago by u/canada_coverage

[Discussion] can we stop arguing about appeal until somebody posts a number

Discussionbranch of 7 comments

can we stop arguing about appeal until somebody posts a number — that is what I am asking, and I have already read the wiki twice. External review, which is the most underused mechanism discussed on this board. Internal appeals are decided by the plan. External review sends the determination to an independent body.…

Read the full submission and all 45 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 1 year ago
u/hplc_hobbyistruns their own column567 points·1 year ago

A peer-to-peer conversation puts the prescribing clinician in front of a reviewing clinician. It bypasses the correspondence cycle entirely and is often the fastest available route.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tomas_lehtinen163 points·1 year ago

New plan year, entirely new criteria, and the denial that had been immovable in the autumn simply did not apply in January.

replysharereportpermalink
u/adaeze_cabrera43 points·1 year ago

What is the appeal deadline on the letter?

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]227 points·1 year ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/appeal_letter_alMOD422 points·1 year ago

Left up. It carries dates, a criterion and an outcome, which is what makes these threads useful.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nnt_nate345 points·1 year ago

What has been documented as tried, and for how long?

replysharereportpermalink
u/runa_wikstrom152 points·1 year ago

a peer-to-peer call is often faster than a written appeal

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/insurancefights

The paperwork war. Prior-authorisation criteria, denial reason codes, step-therapy documentation, external review, employer carve-outs, and the appeal letter templates the community has iterated on for three years. Mostly US-shaped but the tactics generalise.

46kmembers
95submissions
Dec 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/insurancefights rules
  1. Say which country and which plan type. "Insurance" means eleven different things.
  2. Redact member ids and group numbers from every screenshot.
  3. Do not suggest misrepresenting a diagnosis. That is fraud and it gets you banned.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.