[Results] 25 weeks, 12kg, and contraception was the hard part
25 weeks, 12kg, and contraception was the hard part, logged the same way every week so the comparison is at least internally fair.
25 weeks and 12kg — those are the numbers, and they are the ones I am willing to defend.
Insulin resistance is a common feature in PCOS, which is why the metabolic conversation overlaps so heavily with this board. A diagnosis and a finding are still different things and the distinction matters for what the evidence says.
Hormonal variation across the cycle affects appetite, fluid retention and subjective symptom intensity independently of anything else, which is why an unannotated log can look mysterious.
I will update this if the picture changes rather than quietly leaving it up.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The one practical change that makes this board’s hardest questions tractable: annotate your log with the cycle.
Hormonal variation affects appetite, fluid and symptom intensity in its own right. Without the annotation, a log shows a dose, a week and a set of symptoms that appear to move at random. With it, patterns that were invisible become obvious in about three months.
Members here who have done it consistently report the same thing: the same dose feels genuinely different at different points, and knowing that in advance converts a confusing fortnight into an expected one. It also makes a much better document to bring to an appointment.
Fertility changed faster than I expected with the weight loss. Nobody had raised it and I wish somebody had.
hair shedding follows the rate of loss, not the compound
hair shedding follows the rate of loss, not the compound
This is the practical fix for half the confusing weeks on this board — annotate the cycle.
Started logging the cycle in the same sheet as the dose. Three months later the pattern was obvious and it had been invisible before.
Trial populations for the major programmes were not designed around the questions this board asks most often, which is why the evidence base here is genuinely thinner rather than merely harder to find.
Correction: that trial did not enrol the population being discussed, so it cannot support the claim.
Brought the cycle-annotated log to an appointment and it changed the conversation completely.
the same dose can feel different at different points in the month
Is this a PCOS diagnosis or an insulin resistance finding?
Have you asked a pharmacist about the absorption question specifically?
Telogen shedding follows a period of significant weight change rather than a specific compound, and it resolves.
Started logging the cycle in the same sheet as the dose.
Agreed, and the research gap being real rather than imagined is worth saying out loud.
Fertility can change with weight loss and improved insulin sensitivity. That is a well-described phenomenon and worth knowing about in advance rather than discovering.
Has this been raised with whoever prescribes?
Has this been raised with whoever prescribes?
Adding the one thing nobody warns about — fertility can change, and quickly.
fertility can change with weight loss and that surprises people
[deleted]
symptom patterns can track the cycle rather than the dose
Perimenopause and all of this at once, and there is essentially nothing written about the combination anywhere.
Anything involving pregnancy, contraception efficacy or fertility planning belongs with a clinician. That is not a disclaimer, it is where the answers actually are.
The hair shedding was the thing that frightened me most and the thing that mattered least. It stopped.
Questions about oral contraceptive absorption and gastric emptying are legitimate pharmacology questions with product-specific answers. A pharmacist can answer them properly; a board cannot.
The questions that leave this board, and where they go.
Anything about pregnancy, planning a pregnancy, or contraception efficacy goes to a clinician. Absorption questions about a specific oral product go to a pharmacist, who can look it up in minutes. Fertility changes with weight loss are well described and worth raising with whoever prescribes, in advance rather than afterwards.
What stays here usefully: experience, cycle-annotated patterns, the vocabulary, and the collective knowledge that a research gap exists. That is a genuinely valuable set of things and it is a smaller set than people arriving here expect. Nothing on this board is medical advice and on this board that is not a formality.
Careful — anything touching pregnancy is not a board question in any form.
- 1Started logging the cycle in the same sheet as the dose. Three months later…9 comments in this branch · started by u/nnt_nate
- 2Fertility can change with weight loss and improved insulin sensitivity. That…9 comments in this branch · started by u/ewan_zielinski