how much of what we believe about chargeback actually comes from crypto threads
Genuine question, and the title is the question: how much of what we believe about chargeback actually comes from crypto threads.
Nearly sent on the wrong network. The token symbol was identical and the address format was the only clue.
Sent a test amount first on a large order. Cost me a fraction of a percent and I have done it every time since.
Rate quotes expire because the underlying rate moves. A short expiry is ordinary; urgency about your decision is a separate signal and should be read separately.
Screenshot none of this. Read the whole thread, including the parts where I am told I am wrong.
best — the order this archive was captured in
A test transaction costs one extra network fee and verifies the address, the network and the recipient’s crediting process before the main amount moves.
Keep every transaction hash in a note file with the order reference. It has resolved two queries instantly.
Correcting myself upthread: it was 5 confirmations, not the number I posted, and it settled fine.
Confirmation took forty minutes on a busy evening and I had already written half an angry message. Deleted it.
A token symbol identifies an asset, not a network. The same symbol commonly exists on several chains with incompatible address formats, and sending across that boundary is generally unrecoverable.
network and address, checked twice, before anything else
Moved from the vendor board. Payment mechanics live here.
Which networks did they list as accepted?