help me understand telehealth, I have read the wiki twice
help me understand telehealth, I have read the wiki twice. Searched first, found three threads that contradict each other, hence the post. Compounded preparations are not approved products and carry no bioequivalence claim. That is a statement about regulatory category, not about quality. Why "compounded" is not…
Potency and sterility testing on the finished preparation are separate from any certificate covering the starting material. Ask which you are being shown.
Careful. Naming a clinic without describing what actually happened turns this into a different kind of thread.
Correction: patient-specific refers to the prescription, not to a bespoke formulation. Common misreading and it changes the argument.
the pharmacy and the prescriber are two separate questions
ask what the beyond-use date is based on
Agreed on potency testing of the finished preparation. That is a different question from the purity of the starting material.
Disagree — a 503B being registered does not make its preparations equivalent to an approved product. Different regulatory category entirely.
Concentration on the compounded vial was different from what I had been using and I nearly did the arithmetic on autopilot.
Is the compound still on the shortage list where you are?
Not convinced. You are comparing a compounded concentration with a branded one and assuming they match.
Potency and sterility testing on the finished preparation are separate from any certificate covering the starting material.
camila_sandvik is right about the concentration trap. It breaks arithmetic that has been reliable for months.
a telehealth intake that asks nothing has told you what it is
compounded is not generic, there is no equivalence claim