why does nobody talk about water content. Searched first, found three threads that contradict each other, hence the post. Asked for the storage condition behind the…
u/wrong_network_w
Sent USDC on the wrong chain once. Once was enough. Test with $5 first.
member · joined 2 Mar 2024
Overview — page 2 of 2
comment on genuine question about nausea that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/sideeffects · 52 points · 1 year ago
On buying things to fix side effects, which I did extensively and would not do again.
The interventions that changed anything for me were all behavioural and free: smaller meals, eating slower, stopping food a few hours before sleep, more fibre and considerably more water. The things I bought did nothing I could detect, and I was motivated to detect something.
The other lever, which people forget, is time at dose. Holding rather than stepping is a legitimate plan and it fixed my tolerance where nothing else did.
comment on [Meta] the area percent rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/coa · 17 points · 1 year ago
Yes. The structure of the document matters at least as much as the number printed on it.
comment on [Lab] split one vial across VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter — 97.2% and 98.4% in c/coa · 1 points · 1 year ago
area% is not mass%, and the difference is the whole game
comment on [Lab] split one vial across VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter — 97.2% and 96.8% in c/coa · 127 points · 1 year ago
The document I was worried about turned out to be a re-issue with a later creation date. Asked, got the original, entirely ordinary.
comment on [Vendor] SSA vs TFC on the same compound, same month — both cleared 97.5% in c/coa · 830 points · 2 years ago
That is not what the method line says. It names the technique; it does not certify the operator.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify thymosin in c/researchpeptides · 174 points · 2 years ago
On the thin testing history in this board, and what to do about it.
Most of the compounds discussed here have a handful of independent results across the entire site, and several have none. That is a fact about how few members have paid for testing, not a judgement about the material.
What follows: buy small, test identity first for anything unusual, and post the result even when it is unremarkable. The vendor source pages are built from exactly these submissions, and the compounds with the thinnest coverage are the ones where one more entry changes the picture most. Research material is not approved for human use, so what this board can usefully build is an analytical record.
comment on [Discussion] the related substances advice in here is 3 years out of date in c/coa · 71 points · 2 years ago
That is the catalogue certificate rather than the batch-specific one. Same layout, completely different status.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about batch until somebody posts a number in c/coa · 176 points · 2 years ago
Net peptide content is the fraction of the powder that is actually peptide once counterion, water and residual solvent are accounted for. A 99% pure acetate salt can still be about 85% peptide by mass.
comment on week 52 check-in — 14kg down, reflux manageable, one thing confusing me in c/sideeffects · 1 points · 2 years ago
Hair shedding after significant weight loss is a telogen effect that follows the rate of loss. It is not specific to these compounds and it resolves.
comment on someone explain nausea to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/sideeffects · 271 points · 2 years ago
if it is severe or persistent that is a clinician question, not a board question
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify hair loss in c/sideeffects · 290 points · 2 years ago
reflux at night, try not eating in the three hours before bed
comment on [Question] COA — what am I missing here in c/coa · 431 points · 2 years ago
Net peptide content is the fraction of the powder that is actually peptide once counterion, water and residual solvent are accounted for. A 99% pure acetate salt can still be about 85% peptide by mass.