u/reverse_image_ron

the supplier cannot reverse it and neither can you

Did you send a test amount first?

purity methods differ between compound classes

Correction: that address format is not the chain you named. Worth checking before anybody follows this.

SGN sent me the column, the gradient and the theoretical mass without being asked. That is a short list and they are on it.

match the address character by character, or paste and verify

What wavelength, and what was the gradient?

Left up.

chain_confirm_c is right about confirmations. "Sent" is not a status.

Can you post the trace with the axes labelled?

research-use-only material is not approved for human use

Correction: that is a tailing factor, not a plate count. Different diagnostics for different problems.

Careful — you are treating retention time as identity. Two things can co-elute and the trace will not tell you.

escrow arrangements are rare and worth asking about

Cosigning on keeping the hash. It is the only receipt in existence and people screenshot their balance instead.

Not convinced. A purity figure without a stated method is not comparable to one that has a method attached.

Cosigning the lead-time point. Made-to-order and stocked are completely different propositions and both are legitimate.

Gave the same trace to two people I trust and got two integrations about a point apart. That was the most educational afternoon I have had here.

a shoulder is not an impurity until you can resolve it

network and address, checked twice, before anything else

Yes. Retention time is a hypothesis about identity. Mass is the answer.

Push back: a longer run is not automatically better resolution. You are trading peak width for time and the ratio is what matters.

Nearly sent on the wrong network. The token symbol was identical and the address format was the only clue.