u/marisol_moreau
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Bochum.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
Overview — page 3 of 3
comment on how much of what we believe about lane actually comes from shipping threads in c/intlshipping · 457 points · 1 year ago
Packaging is assessable on arrival with no equipment: rigid outer, no movement inside, the cold element sized to the transit rather than to the box.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about appeal until somebody posts a number in c/insurancefights · 40 points · 1 year ago
Appeal deadlines run from the date on the determination letter. They are strict, they are short, and a missed deadline usually forfeits that level entirely.
comment on Medutest — 8 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/labresults · 1 points · 1 year ago
The template is vendor, compound, batch, service, claim, result, and who paid.
This is why the template has a batch field. Without it the result is about a vial nobody can identify.
comment on [Discussion] the below spec advice in here is 2 years out of date in c/labresults · 67 points · 2 years ago
Date of analysis anchors the result to a manufacturing period. A two-year-old result is evidence about two years ago and should be read that way.
comment on genuine question about pharmacy that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/glp1uk · 1 points · 2 years ago
This. The monthly pricing tracker is the most useful thing on this board and it works because nobody is allowed to link anything.
comment on the A1c question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/t2dglp1 · 5 points · 2 years ago
a single high reading is not a trend
comment on [Discussion] the batch advice in here is 3 years out of date in c/labresults · 213 points · 2 years ago
If the report gives a mass spectrum as well as UV purity, say so. Identity and relative quantity are separate claims and the log tracks both.
comment on Spain: copay, and what it actually costs here in c/insurancefights · 24 points · 2 years ago
Correcting myself upthread: the deadline was 24 days, not the figure I gave.
comment on Spain: copay, and what it actually costs here in c/insurancefights · 273 points · 2 years ago
Push back: your plan is an employer plan, which changes both the appeal path and who the regulator is.
comment on reading pricing threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/glp1uk · 152 points · 2 years ago
specialist service, not GP, for tier 3 in most of England
comment on [Discussion] the PeptideMeter advice in here is 2 years out of date in c/labresults · -6 points · 2 years ago
Date of analysis anchors the result to a manufacturing period. A two-year-old result is evidence about two years ago and should be read that way.
comment on the pricing thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/glp1uk · 22 points · 2 years ago
the price difference between pharmacies this month is genuinely large
comment on the pricing thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/glp1uk · 8 points · 2 years ago
Correction: that threshold is your ICB’s, not a national one. They differ and they change by year.
comment on does external review actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/insurancefights · 54 points · 2 years ago
a peer-to-peer call is often faster than a written appeal
comment on [Lab] 5th independent test on HJ — 99.2% on a claimed 99.0%, and the trend is the interesting part in c/labresults · 88 points · 2 years ago
GL Biochem came back 99.3% on a claimed 99.0%, which is agreement not a discrepancy
comment on [Question] step therapy — what am I missing here in c/insurancefights · 134 points · 2 years ago
Careful — the deadline runs from the date on the letter. Waiting for a call back can cost you the appeal entirely.
comment on does formulary actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/insurancefights · 30 points · 2 years ago
Disagree with the tone strategy. Anger has never moved a determination; matching the criterion has.
comment on DHL is the most under-discussed thing on this board in c/intlshipping · 14 points · 2 years ago
Small fix — shipped from the regional warehouse, not from origin, which is why the number looks unusual.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring below spec at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/labresults · 34 points · 2 years ago
What was the claim on the certificate you are comparing against?