1k
[Discussion] the moderation advice in here is 3 years out of date
the moderation advice in here is 3 years out of date, and I am aware this is a minority view on this board. Hard numbers: 3 years. Anything softer than that is flagged…
u/kenji_vasquez
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Cali.
member · joined 14 May 2025
8,525post karma
3,116comment karma
5submissions
52comments
Overview — page 2 of 2
comment on [Discussion] the moderation advice in here is 3 years out of date in c/meta · 54 points · 1 year ago
sponsor disclosure is on the about page in full
comment on meta — 21 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/meta · 10 points · 1 year ago
A rule-change proposal needs replacement wording because that is what can be evaluated. Without it there is nothing to compare against the current text.
comment on [Meta] the 2.4mg rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/semaglutide · 46 points · 1 year ago
Weight change and appetite change are different endpoints on different timescales. Conflating them is where most of the confusion on this board starts.
comment on my ferritin moved and I cannot work out whether FFMI is why in c/glp1muscle · 1 points · 1 year ago
Protein was the whole problem. Appetite dropped and I was eating well under target without noticing for a month.
comment on someone explain moderation to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/meta · 92 points · 1 year ago
Edited a wiki page for the first time and nothing bad happened, which is apparently the point.
comment on three years of long term threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/maintenancephase · 1 points · 1 year ago
Careful — a dose reduction plan is a conversation with someone who knows your history, not a board consensus.
2.9k
[Discussion] the long term advice in here is 3 years out of date
the long term advice in here is 3 years out of date. I have gone back and forth on this for months. The relevant figures are 3 years, and they come from the same log I…
comment on genuine question about Wegovy that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/semaglutide · 160 points · 2 years ago
Not convinced. You changed the dose and the week at the same time, so you cannot attribute the change to either.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for weekly dosing posts in c/semaglutide · 59 points · 2 years ago
What did week 32 look like compared with this one? The month either side is the useful comparison.
comment on how much of what we believe about dose stretching actually comes from regain threads in c/maintenancephase · 1 points · 2 years ago
maintenance is where the logistics finally get boring, which is the point
comment on [Discussion] the Ozempic advice in here is 2 years out of date in c/semaglutide · 1 points · 2 years ago
the appetite signal and the scale move on different clocks
comment on [Discussion] the Ozempic advice in here is 2 years out of date in c/semaglutide · 2 points · 2 years ago
My stall was eleven weeks. Eleven. Then it moved again without me changing anything at all.
comment on [Discussion] the Ozempic advice in here is 2 years out of date in c/semaglutide · 2 points · 2 years ago
Steady state after a dose change takes four to five half-lives, so the fair judgement point on a new step is about a month, not four days.
-34
[Discussion] the Ozempic advice in here is 2 years out of date
the Ozempic advice in here is 2 years out of date, and I am aware this is a minority view on this board. Hard numbers: 2 years. Anything softer than that is flagged as…
comment on someone explain food noise to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/semaglutide · 61 points · 2 years ago
The escalation schedule in the trials existed to keep people on the drug. It is a tolerability ramp, and it is why the label reads the way it does.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify Wegovy in c/semaglutide · 43 points · 2 years ago
This matches me almost exactly, right down to the food noise showing up on the second day and being gone by the fourth.