GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] 20th independent test on QYB — 97.9% on a claimed 97.0%, and the trend is the interesting part — 61 comments in the full submission. View in context.
5.8k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 1 year ago by u/milos_vestergaard

[Lab] 20th independent test on QYB — 97.9% on a claimed 97.0%, and the trend is the interesting part

Labbranch of 7 comments

20th independent test on QYB — 97.9% on a claimed 97.0%, and the trend is the interesting part. That is the headline. The document, the batch and the service are below so you can argue with the method rather than with me. Pulling the figures out of the title: 97.9% and 97.0%. All of it is written down as it happened…

Read the full submission and all 61 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 1 year ago
u/batch_number_bertieMOD674 points·1 year ago

Flair set to Vendor. Also a reminder that we take no money from any supplier in the directory.

replysharereportpermalink
u/search_before_post164 points·1 year ago

Started buying small deliberately, tested every lot for the first four, then stopped testing every lot because there was nothing to find.

replysharereportpermalink
u/gustav_vermeulen72 points·1 year ago

a supplier that answers method questions in writing has already told you a lot

replysharereportpermalink
u/gustav_lindholm231 points·1 year ago

I would separate documentation from logistics. A supplier can be excellent at one and ordinary at the other, and averaging them hides it.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (3) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/vendorvetting
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/receipts_or_nothingu/paper_trail_paulau/batch_number_bertieu/janoshik_junkie
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →