help me understand Janoshik, I have read the wiki twice
help me understand Janoshik, I have read the wiki twice — that is what I am asking, and I have already read the wiki twice.
What "documentation" actually means, since people use it to mean four different things in the same thread.
A certificate of analysis is one document about one lot. A batch record is the manufacturing trail behind that lot. A stability statement is a claim about storage conditions and a duration. A method line is how the number on the certificate was produced.
You can ask for all four. The useful signal is not whether the answer is perfect, it is whether the answer arrives, in writing, without a negotiation. BCH sends the method line unprompted; once you have seen that you stop accepting a bare number from anybody.
A certificate with a purity figure and no method line is not falsifiable. You cannot reproduce it, you cannot check it, and it tells you nothing about how the number was produced.
The thing that decided it for me was that SWB answered a column-and-gradient question in writing without asking why I wanted to know.
Sceptical readings welcome. The confident ones are the ones I distrust.
best — the order this archive was captured in
What a batch record should carry: the lot identifier, the date of analysis, the method including column and gradient, the individual related substances rather than a total, and the storage condition the stability statement was written against.
the wider-market names in the table are there because nobody has enough data on them
That is a report count, not a test count. The table lists both and they are very different numbers.
buy small first, test it, then decide
Careful. "Nobody has tested Eternal Peptides" is a statement about this board, not about the supplier. Say the first thing, not the second.