GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] we are measuring testing at the wrong time and calling it noise — 66 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2.4k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 2 years ago by u/aleksi_lehtinen

[Discussion] we are measuring testing at the wrong time and calling it noise

Discussionbranch of 6 comments

we are measuring testing at the wrong time and calling it noise — a position I have arrived at slowly and would like tested. Why the directory has two tiers, since the question comes up whenever somebody new finds it. Twenty suppliers have enough independent results, over enough separate lots, over enough time, that…

Read the full submission and all 66 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 2 years ago
u/liv_dumitru99 points·2 years ago

Did the lot code on the vial match the paperwork?

replysharereportpermalink
u/teodor_lokken144 points·2 years ago

Sent the same compound from BCH and QYB to Medutest in the same month. Both came back above the claim on the certificate — mine was 99.6% on a stated 99.0%.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dilara_weiss80 points·2 years ago·edited

Fixing my own comment above: I said 2 orders and it is 24. The pattern is the same, the count was wrong.

replysharereportpermalink
u/elise_grimaldi122 points·2 years ago

the source page log is more useful than the score above it

replysharereportpermalink
u/swirl_dont_shakereconstitution28 points·2 years ago·edited

Trusted Peptide shows up in threads constantly and has almost nothing on file

replysharereportpermalink
u/sig_figs_sammod · analytical17 points·2 years ago

Which service did the testing, and did you pay for it yourself?

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/vendorvetting
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/receipts_or_nothingu/paper_trail_paulau/batch_number_bertieu/janoshik_junkie
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →