GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] MKM tirz — Medutest came back 97.8% against a claimed 97.0% — 11 comments in the full submission. View in context.
-24
c/vendorvetting·submitted 3 months ago by u/aleksi_lehtinen

[Lab] MKM tirz — Medutest came back 97.8% against a claimed 97.0%

Labbranch of 7 comments

MKM tirz — Medutest came back 97.8% against a claimed 97.0%. One vial, one service, one member paying, which is the only kind of result this board should treat as evidence. 97.8% and 97.0%. Those are measured, not estimated, and not rounded up in my favour. Six orders across two years from JEEP. Same packaging, same…

Read the full submission and all 11 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 3 months ago
u/bastian_aalto5 points·3 months ago

A certificate with a purity figure and no method line is not falsifiable. You cannot reproduce it, you cannot check it, and it tells you nothing about how the number was produced.

replysharereportpermalink
u/matias_falk3 points·3 months ago

Which service did the testing, and did you pay for it yourself?

replysharereportpermalink
u/boots_or_bust1 point·3 months ago

Not convinced by the ranking-by-vibe approach here. The community number is derived from reports; your feeling is derived from four posts you remember.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dagny_ogunleye1 point·3 months ago

reship policy in writing before the order, not after

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]1 point·3 months ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/boots_or_bust1 point·3 months ago

buy small first, test it, then decide

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.comSponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
More in c/vendorvetting
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/receipts_or_nothingu/paper_trail_paulau/batch_number_bertieu/janoshik_junkie
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →