[Results] 66 weeks on 15mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring
Six-word version is the title — 66 weeks on 15mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring — and the rest is context. 66 weeks and 15mg. Those are measured, not estimated, and not rounded up in my favour. SURMOUNT-1 ran 72 weeks with the top arm around 21% mean body weight change. SURPASS is the diabetes programme and…
if 7.5 is working, 10 is not automatically better
Left up, flair changed to Discussion. It is an opinion post and that is fine as long as it is labelled.
week 6 is early to draw any conclusion at all
Did you come to this from sema, and if so how long was the gap?
Careful with "everyone tolerates it better". The people it did not suit stop posting, which makes this board look calmer than the drug is.
if 7.5 is working, 10 is not automatically better
Agreed, with one qualifier: that is the mean of the top arm and the spread around it was enormous.
Came off sema and onto tirz with a two-week gap. The first month was flat and I assumed I had made a mistake. Month two it moved.
Came off sema and onto tirz with a two-week gap.
Saving this one. It is the clearest statement of the stall problem I have read here.
Right. And the sema-to-tirz "conversion" people post is invented. There is no published equivalence.
stepping every four weeks is a ceiling on speed, not a schedule you must hit
Right.
This. The step interval is a floor, and reading it as a timetable is the most expensive mistake in the thread.