[PSA] GIP is not what most of this community thinks it is
Explainer, as requested in the last thread: GIP is not what most of this community thinks it is. Vials and pens carry the same molecule; what differs is fill volume, device tolerance and whether you are doing your own arithmetic. Neither is inherently more accurate. The four-week interval in the label is a minimum.…
Not sure that follows. You went up a step and changed your training in the same fortnight.
Did you come to this from sema, and if so how long was the gap?
sulphur burps are the signature complaint and they are not dangerous
the trials titrated on a calendar, real people titrate on symptoms
the trials titrated on a calendar, real people titrate on symptoms
Saving this one. It is the clearest statement of the stall problem I have read here.
The 21% figure is a 72-week mean on the highest arm. Quoting it as what someone should expect by week 10 is not a fair reading.
Agreed, and the trial number is a mean of a very wide distribution — the tails are enormous and nobody posts from the middle.
if 7.5 is working, 10 is not automatically better
the four-week step schedule is the label, not folklore
a lot of people plateau nicely at 10mg and never need 15
Appetite effect for me is flat across seven days. On sema it was a wave. Same person, different molecule.