GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of the fraud thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down — 21 comments in the full submission. View in context.
5.1k
c/scamalerts·submitted 9 months ago by u/milan_villalobos

the fraud thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down

Confirmedbranch of 7 comments

the fraud thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down. It is the sort of thing everyone half-believes and nobody writes down. Nearly paid a cloned storefront. Caught it because one character in the domain was wrong and I paste rather than type. Was in a group buy that went quiet for six weeks. It…

Read the full submission and all 21 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 9 months ago
u/nordic_pricing257 points·9 months ago·edited

The site had a decade of testimonials and a domain registered in March. That was the entire investigation.

replysharereportpermalink
u/milan_villalobosOP120 points·9 months ago

report it here with dates, not adjectives

replysharereportpermalink
u/georgi_tamm70 points·9 months ago

Disagree with naming anyone on that basis. One person’s bad month is not a pattern and the sidebar exists for this exact reason.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ines_ekstrom46 points·9 months ago

Careful. What you are describing is a delayed shipment, and this board should not turn that into an accusation without more.

replysharereportpermalink
u/stubborn_batchlist_pls43 points·9 months ago

a shop that will only talk off-platform has told you something

replysharereportpermalink
u/greta_chukwu122 points·9 months ago

pressure to decide today is the oldest signal there is

replysharereportpermalink
u/blunt_coldbox_notes84 points·9 months ago

Yes — describe the sequence of events with dates. That is a report. Adjectives are not.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.