GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Question] is 95.1% actually fine or am I being sold a rounding error — 51 comments in the full submission. View in context.
787
c/scamalerts·submitted 1 year ago by u/nikhil_teixeira

[Question] is 95.1% actually fine or am I being sold a rounding error

Questionbranch of 8 comments

is 95.1% actually fine or am I being sold a rounding error, and before anyone asks: same batch throughout, single submission, no cherry-picking between services. The relevant figures are 95.1%, and they come from the same log I have kept the whole time. Was in a group buy that went quiet for six weeks. It resolved in…

Read the full submission and all 51 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 1 year ago
u/whois_wandaMOD18 points·1 year ago

Merged into the standing thread for that domain so the reports sit in one place.

replysharereportpermalink
u/aleksi_marchand5 points·1 year ago

The site had a decade of testimonials and a domain registered in March. That was the entire investigation.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bilal_adebayo8 points·1 year ago

Not convinced. A payment window that closed is a payment window, not evidence of intent.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sock_puppet_spotter-10 points·1 year ago

ask for a batch-specific document before you send anything

replysharereportpermalink
u/signe_boateng1 point·1 year ago·edited

That is a report count, not a test count, and it changes how thin the evidence base actually is.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]1 point·1 year ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/mei_cardoso13 points·1 year ago

The directory deliberately separates "we have nothing on this name" from "this went badly". Collapsing the two is how boards like this generate false certainty.

replysharereportpermalink
u/long_post_larry6 points·1 year ago

The directory deliberately separates "we have nothing on this name" from "this went badly".

Disagreeing here: that is a delay, and this board has to keep delay and intent in separate columns.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.