GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] SGN BPC — VendorInvestigate came back 97.8% against a claimed 97.0% — 25 comments in the full submission. View in context.
3.6k
c/researchpeptides·submitted 1 year ago by u/formulary_fighter

[Lab] SGN BPC — VendorInvestigate came back 97.8% against a claimed 97.0%

Labbranch of 8 comments

Filing this under things worth writing down: SGN BPC — VendorInvestigate came back 97.8% against a claimed 97.0%. Figures up front so nobody has to dig: 97.8% and 97.0%. Net peptide content accounts for counterion, water and residual solvent. On some of these compounds the gap between purity and net content is…

Read the full submission and all 25 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 1 year ago
u/throwaway_9182488 points·1 year ago

Which exact molecule? That name covers more than one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rui_only_roMOD282 points·1 year ago

Asked for a catalogue number rather than removing. Common names are ambiguous here and it makes threads unusable later.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bastian_aalto225 points·1 year ago

Correction: that name covers two different molecules and the thread has been discussing both as one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/formulary_fighterOPappeals158 points·1 year ago

Correcting my own comment: the storage condition I quoted was for the lyophilised powder, not for solution.

replysharereportpermalink
u/formulary_fighterOPappeals91 points·1 year ago·edited

a secretagogue and a fragment are not the same class of thing

replysharereportpermalink
u/marit_mensa64 points·1 year ago

lyophilised and stored cold is the default for a reason

replysharereportpermalink
u/formulary_fighterOPappeals33 points·1 year ago·edited

What lead time were you quoted for that line?

replysharereportpermalink
u/vendorinvestigate_vic285 points·1 year ago

Small fix — that is net peptide content, not purity. Both are on the certificate and they differ substantially here.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/researchpeptides

The wider research-peptide catalogue: thymosin fragments, GH secretagogues, melanocortin agonists, and the long tail of three-letter analogs. Focus on identity verification, handling and the state of the evidence — not on protocols, because these are not approved for human use.

29kmembers
62submissions
Mar 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/researchpeptides
c/researchpeptides rules
  1. Research use only. Handling and analysis, not administration.
  2. Name the compound precisely. "TB-500" and "Thymosin Beta-4" are not the same product.
  3. Evidence-level statements required: in vitro, rodent, or human.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/sequence_checkeru/tb500_tangentu/rui_only_rou/analog_alphabet
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →