[Discussion] the GH secretagogue story is 30 years old and mostly a cautionary tale
the GH secretagogue story is 30 years old and mostly a cautionary tale, which sounds obvious until you try to state the evidence for it. Figures up front so nobody has to dig: 30 years. Net peptide content accounts for counterion, water and residual solvent. On some of these compounds the gap between purity and net…
Stocked lines and made-to-order lines have different lead times and different storage histories. Both are ordinary; the difference is worth confirming before you commit.
Standing reminder: research-use-only material is not approved for human use, and no outcome claims without evidence.
Net peptide content on the certificate was well below the purity figure and both were honest. Chemistry, not deception.
Net peptide content on the certificate was well below the purity figure and both were honest.
isabela_nilsen is right that a purity figure without a method is not comparable to one with a method.
Stocked lines and made-to-order lines have different lead times and different storage histories.
This is the rule for anything unusual. Identity before anything else.
Research-use-only material is not approved for human use. In this catalogue that covers essentially everything, which is why the board discusses material and analytics rather than outcomes.