[Lab] GGPeps orfo — VendorInvestigate came back 99.3% against a claimed 99.0%
Posting this because the title is the whole finding — GGPeps orfo — VendorInvestigate came back 99.3% against a claimed 99.0% — and a number without its method is a rumour. Hard numbers: 99.3% and 99.0%. Anything softer than that is flagged as an impression. Nothing containing this compound is approved by any…
Analytically this is a small-molecule identity and purity problem, not a peptide one. The methods, the impurity classes and the reference standards are all different.
Small fix — the two programme names got swapped upthread and it changes which population the figure came from.
do not assume reconstitution intuitions apply, there is nothing to reconstitute
Milligram comparisons across molecule classes are meaningless. Potency is a property of the molecule at its receptor, not of the number on the label.
a non-peptide agonist does not degrade the way a peptide does
Agreed — non-peptide is the fact that everything else follows from, including the manufacturing and the analytics.
nothing containing this is approved anywhere and research material is not for human use
Milligram-for-milligram comparison with an injectable peptide is not meaningful and I should not have made it.