GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of how much of what we believe about HPLC actually comes from LC-MS threads — 65 comments in the full submission. View in context.
3.2k
c/hplc·submitted 11 months ago by u/valeria_cardoso

how much of what we believe about HPLC actually comes from LC-MS threads

Methodbranch of 6 comments

how much of what we believe about HPLC actually comes from LC-MS threads. Searched first, found three threads that contradict each other, hence the post. Chased a ghost peak for three weeks. It was the plumbing. It is always the plumbing. A shoulder that does not baseline-resolve cannot be quantified honestly. You…

Read the full submission and all 65 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 11 months ago
u/sig_figs_samMOD218 points·11 months ago

Left up. The integration disagreement in this thread is the most useful thing on the board this week.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_novak175 points·11 months ago

That is area percent, not mass percent. The trace cannot give you the second one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/arne_nyberg42 points·11 months ago

Bought a second-hand instrument and learned more in six months of fixing it than in three years of reading traces.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]30 points·11 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/valeria_cardosoOP94 points·11 months ago

a blank injection between samples costs four minutes and settles most arguments

replysharereportpermalink
u/aksel_palacios52 points·11 months ago

Correction: that is a tailing factor, not a plate count. Different diagnostics for different problems.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/hplc

The analytical deep end: RP-HPLC methods, gradient design, integration decisions, LC-MS confirmation, amino-acid analysis, water content, and why two labs can report 98.1% and 96.4% on the same vial and both be right. Post the chromatogram, not the summary line.

32kmembers
130submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/hplc rules
  1. Chromatogram or it did not happen. Axis labels included.
  2. State the method: column, gradient, detection wavelength, injection volume.
  3. Area% is not mass%. Posts that conflate them get a correction flair, not a removal.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.