GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] the Ontario answer is not the Alberta answer — 19 comments in the full submission. View in context.
162
c/glp1canada·submitted 8 days ago by u/greta_perrin

[Discussion] the Ontario answer is not the Alberta answer

Discussionbranch of 8 comments

the Ontario answer is not the Alberta answer, which sounds obvious until you try to state the evidence for it. Criteria changed at plan renewal and the denial that had been immovable simply did not apply any more. Special authorization is a documented exception process with published criteria. Applications that…

Read the full submission and all 19 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 7 days ago
u/ferritin_low7 points·7 days ago

Formulary criteria are revised, and plan renewal is a natural point at which a previously refused request may succeed without anything about the applicant changing.

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_karlsen2 points·6 days ago

compare cash prices before assuming coverage is the only path

replysharereportpermalink
u/neha_erdogan0 points·6 days ago

Formulary criteria are revised, and plan renewal is a natural point at which a previously refused request may succeed without anything about the appli

ferritin_low is right that a rejected claim and a denied authorization are different animals.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kian_ekstrom1 point·6 days ago

a rejected claim is not the same as a denied authorization

replysharereportpermalink
u/sanne_novak1 point·6 days ago

Provincial plan, employer plan, or paying cash?

replysharereportpermalink
u/piotr_nascimento1 point·6 days ago

What did the denial actually say?

replysharereportpermalink
u/greta_lokken1 point·6 days ago

Same view — private and provincial plans are genuinely different processes with different appeal routes.

replysharereportpermalink
u/food_noise_gonemaintenance1 point·6 days ago

ask the pharmacy what the cash price is, it varies

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/glp1canada

Canadian access: provincial formulary differences, private plan coverage, the special-authorisation process, cross-border pricing arbitrage and why the Ontario answer is not the Alberta answer.

17kmembers
62submissions
Apr 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/glp1canada rules
  1. Name your province. Coverage is provincial.
  2. Private plan details: redact your group number.
  3. No cross-border purchasing instructions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.