unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about USDC is guesswork
unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about USDC is guesswork. It is the sort of thing everyone half-believes and nobody writes down. Got a quote with a fifteen-minute expiry and assumed it was a pressure tactic. It was just a held rate. Sent to the right address on the wrong chain years ago. Nothing to be…
Some chains require a memo or destination tag to route funds to the right account. Omitting it on those chains is one of the more common ways payments go astray.
Wallet address redacted from the post above. Hashes are fine here; addresses are not.
Memo requirements are chain-specific. The chain you are describing does not use one.
Yes — the same token symbol on two chains catches people constantly and it is unrecoverable.
[removed by moderator]
A token symbol identifies an asset, not a network. The same symbol commonly exists on several chains with incompatible address formats, and sending across that boundary is generally unrecoverable.
nobody legitimate needs the payment in the next ten minutes
Small fix — that is the network fee, not a supplier charge. The distinction matters for the complaint you are making.