three years of sequence threads, summarised so you do not have to read them
three years of sequence threads, summarised so you do not have to read them. It is the sort of thing everyone half-believes and nobody writes down. Every claim I could trace in this board went back to about four papers. That was a sobering afternoon. Bought small, tested identity first, and only then thought about…
Left up. It distinguishes rodent work from human work, which is the standard on this board.
Left up.
Disagreeing with this line: that paper is in a rodent model and it is being quoted as a human result.
Correction: that study was in rodents. Worth stating explicitly since the thread has been reading it as clinical.
preclinical enthusiasm is not clinical evidence
[removed by moderator]
the human evidence is thin and the rodent evidence is not