help me understand rodent data, I have read the wiki twice
help me understand rodent data, I have read the wiki twice. If this has been answered properly somewhere, link me and I will delete. Assumed regulatory status was static and it was not. Checked again this year and the answer had changed where I live. Went and read the primary rodent papers after arguing about a…
Ask for the theoretical mass alongside the measured one. It is a one-line addition to a certificate and it converts a purity claim into an identity claim.
Correction: that study was in rodents. Worth stating explicitly since the thread has been reading it as clinical.
Kept a reconstituted vial too long out of curiosity and learned something about solution stability I would rather have read.
Every claim I could trace in this board went back to about four papers. That was a sobering afternoon.
Agreed — cheap to make is a double-edged fact and it explains a lot about this corner of the market.
Small fix — fifteen residues, not seventeen. The sequence is public and easy to check.
Careful. Regulatory status differs by jurisdiction and has changed; a confident global statement is going to be wrong somewhere.