GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] Homopeptide BPC — Medutest came back 98.6% against a claimed 98.0% — 27 comments in the full submission. View in context.
3.7k
c/bpc157·submitted 11 months ago by u/tb500_tangent

[Lab] Homopeptide BPC — Medutest came back 98.6% against a claimed 98.0%

Labbranch of 8 comments

Homopeptide BPC — Medutest came back 98.6% against a claimed 98.0%. One vial, one service, one member paying, which is the only kind of result this board should treat as evidence. The relevant figures are 98.6% and 98.0%, and they come from the same log I have kept the whole time. Bought small, tested identity first,…

Read the full submission and all 27 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 11 months ago
u/pavel_kravchenko360 points·11 months ago

Yes. Nothing here is approved for human use and that should be the first line of every thread, not the last.

replysharereportpermalink
u/batch_number_bertievetting-2 points·11 months ago

identity, quantity, stability — three separate questions

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]1 point·11 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/tb500_tangentOP150 points·11 months ago

Is that a clinical claim or a preclinical one?

replysharereportpermalink
u/marta_weiss105 points·11 months ago

Correction: that study was in rodents. Worth stating explicitly since the thread has been reading it as clinical.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rui_only_ro79 points·11 months ago

Regulatory classification differs between jurisdictions and has changed in several of them recently. Any answer to a status question needs a place and a date attached.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (2) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/bpc157

BPC-157 as it actually is: a pentadecapeptide with a genuinely interesting rodent tendon-and-gut literature, near-zero controlled human data, a naming and sequence mess in the supply chain, and a regulatory status that changed sharply in several countries.

35kmembers
62submissions
Mar 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/bpc157 rules
  1. Research use only. No human protocols, no injection instructions.
  2. Rodent data must be labelled as rodent data in the body.
  3. Sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.