Posting this as a discussion rather than a claim: we are measuring regain at the wrong time and calling it noise. Preparing to stop, as described by people here who…
u/patient_labslip_log
I post rarely and I check my numbers twice.
newer member · joined 24 Mar 2024
Overview — page 3 of 3
comment on [Lab] 20th independent test on QYB — 97.9% on a claimed 97.0%, and the trend is the interesting part in c/vendorvetting · 100 points · 1 year ago
reship policy in writing before the order, not after
comment on switched from 0.5mg to 1.0mg and early fullness got better, not worse in c/tapering · 10 points · 1 year ago
Have you had the conversation with a clinician yet?
comment on goal — my 3-week log, condensed into one table in c/progresspics · 0 points · 1 year ago
Cosigning on timeframe. "15kg" means something completely different over 18 months than over one.
comment on someone explain pharmacy to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/glp1eu · 1 points · 1 year ago
ask for the Beipackzettel or the local equivalent, it answers most questions
comment on why does nobody talk about survodutide in c/survodutide · 62 points · 1 year ago
fibrosis improvement without worsening steatohepatitis is the phrase to learn
comment on does goal actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/progresspics · 82 points · 1 year ago
How long was the stall before it moved?
comment on why does nobody talk about Apotheke in c/glp1eu · 18 points · 1 year ago
a shortage in one member state is not a shortage in all of them
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring regain at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/tapering · 1 points · 1 year ago
Correcting myself upthread: appetite returned at week 10 for me, not the week I posted.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring regain at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/tapering · 32 points · 1 year ago
Wrote down where I was before changing anything. That single page made the following six months interpretable.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring regain at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/tapering · 67 points · 1 year ago
write down where you are before you change anything
comment on [Lab] HJ tirz — Janoshik came back 97.8% against a claimed 97.0% in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 1 year ago
Which lane, and what was the quoted lead time at checkout?
comment on milestone — 11 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/progresspics · 159 points · 2 years ago
How are you keeping track — spreadsheet, notebook, nothing?
comment on three years of reimbursement threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/glp1eu · 21 points · 2 years ago
What pack size is that price for?
comment on the Apotheke thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/glp1eu · 1 points · 2 years ago
The variation between pharmacies inside my own country was larger than the variation I had been chasing across the border.
comment on pharmacy — 20 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/glp1eu · 22 points · 2 years ago
What pack size is that price for?
comment on why does nobody talk about reship in c/vendorvetting · 203 points · 2 years ago
How many separate lots is that across? One lot tested twice is one data point.
comment on [Lab] split one vial across PeptideMeter and VendorInvestigate — 99.0% and 99.1% in c/vendorvetting · 266 points · 2 years ago
Agreed on buying small first. The cost of a test is small next to the cost of committing to a supplier you have not checked.
comment on someone explain Medutest to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/vendorvetting · 153 points · 2 years ago
Did you ask for the batch-specific certificate, or the generic one?