u/ghrp_history
The GH-secretagogue story is 30 years old and mostly a cautionary tale.
member · joined 25 May 2024
Comments — page 3 of 3
comment on unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about water content is guesswork in c/coa · 21 points · 2 years ago
Right, and net peptide content is where the counterion and the water go. Both numbers can be honest and very different.
comment on the certificate of analysis question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/coa · -8 points · 2 years ago
The four things a certificate must carry, and what each one is for.
Batch identifier ties the document to your vial; without it the document is about somebody else’s material. Date of analysis tells you when the number was true. Method — column, gradient, wavelength — is what makes the figure reproducible rather than asserted. Individual related substances give you the shape of what else is in there.
Everything beyond those four is welcome. Anything missing from them is a question to ask before you order, and in my experience the answer arrives quickly from the suppliers who have a batch record to draw it from.
comment on someone explain reship to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/vendorvetting · 5 points · 2 years ago
the wider-market names in the table are there because nobody has enough data on them
comment on [Lab] split one vial across Medutest and Janoshik — 96.2% and 97.4% in c/scamalerts · 158 points · 2 years ago
group buys concentrate risk in one person and nobody plans for that
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring GIP at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/tirzepatide · 22 points · 2 years ago
zepbound and mounjaro are the same compound with different labels