GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
DO

u/downvote_magnet

Negative comment karma and completely at peace with it.

member · joined 6 Sep 2024

10,043post karma
3,569comment karma
1submissions
51comments

Overview — page 2 of 2

comment on integration — 22 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/hplc · 423 points · 1 year ago

Area percent is the integrated area of your peak over the total integrated area at one wavelength on one gradient.

Disagreeing with this bit: that spread is ordinary inter-lab variance, not a disagreement about the material.

permalink

comment on genuine question about LC-MS that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/hplc · 1 points · 1 year ago

That figure cannot be quoted to two decimals off that baseline. The precision is not in the data.

permalink

comment on [Discussion] progress is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/progresspics · 168 points · 1 year ago

the clothes change before the number does

permalink

comment on [Question] is 98.1% actually fine or am I being sold a rounding error in c/hplc · 15 points · 1 year ago

Do you have the mass, or only the UV trace?

permalink

comment on [Discussion] chromatogram is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/hplc · 61 points · 1 year ago

Bought a second-hand instrument and learned more in six months of fixing it than in three years of reading traces.

permalink

comment on [Lab] CPC cagri — Janoshik came back 98.1% against a claimed 97.5% in c/hplc · 102 points · 1 year ago

How old is the column and roughly how many injections has it seen?

permalink

comment on why does nobody talk about gradient in c/hplc · 86 points · 1 year ago

a shoulder is not an impurity until you can resolve it

permalink

comment on [Results] 12 weeks on 1.7mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/progresspics · 66 points · 1 year ago

progress is not linear and nobody’s is

permalink

comment on [Discussion] LC-MS is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/hplc · 1 points · 1 year ago

Agreed. Two analysts, one trace, two integration choices, and a spread that has nothing to do with the vial.

permalink

comment on integration is the most under-discussed thing on this board in c/hplc · 524 points · 2 years ago

Mass spectrometry answers identity. UV purity answers relative quantity under the run conditions. A document with one and not the other is answering half the question, and the half it answers should be stated.

permalink

comment on chromatogram is the most under-discussed thing on this board in c/hplc · 30 points · 2 years ago

Right. And a blank between injections settles the carryover argument before it starts.

permalink

Trophy case
Top Contributor Answered the Question
Cake day 6 Sep 2024
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
Where they post
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.