GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
AN

u/andres_sorensen

Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Ghent.

member · joined 16 Jul 2025

17,419post karma
5,873comment karma
5submissions
54comments

Overview — page 2 of 2

comment on does reconstitution actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/reconstitution · 0 points · 1 year ago

I would not round that figure. At 10mg/mL a rounding error of two units is a real fraction of the intended amount.

permalink

comment on stalled for 12 weeks at 10mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/retatrutide · 51 points · 1 year ago

Correction: TRIUMPH is the phase 3 programme. The number you are quoting is from the phase 2 readout, which is a different trial.

permalink

comment on triple agonist: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/retatrutide · 709 points · 1 year ago

Nothing containing this compound is approved anywhere. Research-use-only material is not approved for human use, and that is a statement of fact rather than a disclaimer.

permalink

comment on stalled for 11 weeks at 12.5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/retatrutide · 25 points · 1 year ago

Stopped at a low step because there was no reason to go further and no data to tell me what further would do.

permalink

comment on TRIUMPH: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/retatrutide · 2 points · 1 year ago

Cosigning the escalation point. Almost every difficult report on this board is from somebody who went up quickly.

permalink

comment on [Discussion] the insulin syringe advice in here is 2 years out of date in c/reconstitution · 14 points · 1 year ago

Asked SGN what volume they reconstitute to for their own stability testing and they answered in one line. Useful thing to know.

permalink

comment on glucagon: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/retatrutide · 536 points · 1 year ago

Disagree. "More receptors means more effect" is not how any of this works and the trial data does not support the linear story.

permalink

comment on someone explain phase 2 to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/retatrutide · 172 points · 2 years ago

Yes — the comparison threads are apples to oranges and they generate more heat than anything else here.

permalink

comment on [Discussion] the mg/mL advice in here is 3 years out of date in c/reconstitution · 39 points · 2 years ago

Small fix — a U-100 syringe is 100 units per mL. If yours is marked differently it is not U-100 and the whole calculation changes.

permalink

comment on [Question] how do you actually verify insulin syringe in c/reconstitution · 15 points · 2 years ago

Spent 24 weeks confused about this until somebody drew the table for me. 10mg, 2mL, 5mg/mL, 0.75mg is 15 units. That is the whole thing.

permalink

comment on week 19 check-in — 9kg down, early fullness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/retatrutide · 7 points · 2 years ago

small trial, big effect, wide error bars

permalink

comment on bacteriostatic water — 16 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/reconstitution · 33 points · 2 years ago

The arithmetic in full: concentration is mass over volume, so 30mg into 1mL gives 30mg/mL. A U-100 syringe is graduated at 100 units per millilitre, so 1.5mg is 1.5 divided by 30 millilitres, which is 5 units.

permalink

comment on [Results] 45 weeks on 10mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 2 years ago

The constipation profile felt different rather than worse. Hard to describe and impossible to quantify, so take it as an impression.

permalink

comment on unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about glucagon is guesswork in c/retatrutide · 143 points · 2 years ago

Has anyone posted an independent test on this compound recently?

permalink

comment on unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about glucagon is guesswork in c/retatrutide · 33 points · 2 years ago

Small fix — three receptors, not two. GLP-1, GIP and glucagon, and the third one is the reason this compound gets its own board.

permalink

comment on unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about glucagon is guesswork in c/retatrutide · 109 points · 2 years ago

Correction: TRIUMPH is the phase 3 programme. The number you are quoting is from the phase 2 readout, which is a different trial.

permalink

comment on reading concentration threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/reconstitution · 53 points · 2 years ago

Yes. Writing 5mg/mL on the vial takes four seconds and removes the entire class of error this board exists to fix.

permalink

Trophy case

No trophies yet. Most accounts here never get one.

Cake day 16 Jul 2025
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
Where they post
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.