u/aksel_jansen
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Braga.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
Comments — page 2 of 2
comment on someone explain batch to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/labresults · 0 points · 1 year ago
First result I ever posted here got asked for the batch number and the claim.
Agreed — and two services on one batch is the strongest thing any of us can produce individually.
comment on the Janoshik thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/labresults · 53 points · 1 year ago
Push back: three tests on one lot is one lot. It tells you about that lot and almost nothing about the next one.
comment on [Question] is 95.1% actually fine or am I being sold a rounding error in c/scamalerts · 87 points · 1 year ago
no names without evidence, that is the sidebar rule and it is a good one
comment on Medutest — 8 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/labresults · 83 points · 1 year ago
date of analysis matters as much as the number
comment on cloned site is the most under-discussed thing on this board in c/scamalerts · 52 points · 2 years ago
What dates are we talking about — order, payment, last contact?
Disagreeing here: that is a delay, and this board has to keep delay and intent in separate columns.
comment on unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about TGA is guesswork in c/glp1aus · 27 points · 2 years ago
PBS listing and TGA registration are two different questions
comment on [Discussion] the PeptideMeter advice in here is 2 years out of date in c/labresults · 22 points · 2 years ago
Do you have the trace, or only the summary?
comment on [Discussion] fake COA is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/scamalerts · 119 points · 2 years ago
the review page nobody can find on any other site is a warning
comment on why does nobody talk about test results in c/labresults · 9 points · 2 years ago
Kept every report as a PDF with the batch in the filename. Two years in, it is the most useful folder I own.