GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] split one vial across PeptideMeter and VendorInvestigate — 98.4% and 98.6% — 54 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.5k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 1 year ago by u/zeynep_zielinski

[Lab] split one vial across PeptideMeter and VendorInvestigate — 98.4% and 98.6%

Labbranch of 7 comments

split one vial across PeptideMeter and VendorInvestigate — 98.4% and 98.6%, and before anyone asks: same batch throughout, single submission, no cherry-picking between services. 98.4% and 98.6% — those are the numbers, and they are the ones I am willing to defend. Regional stock made more difference to my planning…

Read the full submission and all 54 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 1 year ago
u/mikkel_kimani37 points·1 year ago·edited

Lead time and minimum quantity are the two facts people forget to ask for and then argue about later. Both are answerable in one email before you commit.

replysharereportpermalink
u/britt_zamora23 points·1 year ago

Inter-lab variance on this assay runs a point or two either way. Two services disagreeing by that much is agreement, not a discrepancy, and treating it otherwise starts pointless arguments.

replysharereportpermalink
u/arne_nyberg19 points·1 year ago

reship policy in writing before the order, not after

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]17 points·1 year ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/ghrp_history24 points·1 year ago·edited

Minimum order and lead time — did they quote both up front?

replysharereportpermalink
u/chidi_roos4 points·1 year ago

the lot on the vial has to match the lot on the certificate, every time

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_osei29 points·1 year ago

The thing that decided it for me was that SGN answered a column-and-gradient question in writing without asking why I wanted to know.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.