someone explain fake COA to me like I have not read a paper in years
someone explain fake COA to me like I have not read a paper in years — that is what I am asking, and I have already read the wiki twice. The group-buy structure, described neutrally, because the arguments here always get personal. One person collects money, places one order, receives it, splits it and forwards it.…
The checks I run before sending money anywhere new, in order, and none of them cost anything.
Domain first, character by character, pasted rather than typed. Then registration age against the claimed trading history. Then a request, in writing, for a batch-specific certificate for the lot they would ship — not the catalogue document.
Then a small order, tested independently. Only after that a real one. This sequence has cost me a handful of small orders and it has never once cost me a large one, which is the whole point.
The checks I run before sending money anywhere new, in order, and none of them cost anything.
Disagreeing here: that is a delay, and this board has to keep delay and intent in separate columns.
Do you have anything in writing from before the payment?
Group buys concentrate custody, payment and communication in one person with no structure behind it. That is not an accusation about anyone — it is a description of the risk shape.
Small fix — the name you are describing is in the wider-market table with almost nothing on file, not in the documented twenty.
Cosigning the domain check. Character by character, every time, and paste it rather than typing it.