GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] 4th independent test on GGPeps — 97.9% on a claimed 97.5%, and the trend is the interesting part — 30 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2.3k
c/scamalerts·submitted 1 year ago by u/sock_puppet_spotter

[Lab] 4th independent test on GGPeps — 97.9% on a claimed 97.5%, and the trend is the interesting part

Resolvedbranch of 7 comments

Short version of the title, which is already short: 4th independent test on GGPeps — 97.9% on a claimed 97.5%, and the trend is the interesting part. Longer version underneath. Pulling the figures out of the title: 97.9% and 97.5%. All of it is written down as it happened rather than reconstructed. The group-buy…

Read the full submission and all 30 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 1 year ago
u/isabela_guerrero174 points·1 year ago

Disagree with naming anyone on that basis. One person’s bad month is not a pattern and the sidebar exists for this exact reason.

replysharereportpermalink
u/careful_gradient_notes121 points·1 year ago

Small fix — the name you are describing is in the wider-market table with almost nothing on file, not in the documented twenty.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sock_puppet_spotterOP-9 points·1 year ago

Has anyone else in the thread got the same domain in their history?

replysharereportpermalink
u/sock_puppet_spotterOP1 point·1 year ago

Correcting my own post: the payment date was the 14th, not the 4th. The gap is smaller than I made it sound.

replysharereportpermalink
u/whois_wanda1 point·1 year ago

Correcting my own post: the payment date was the 14th, not the 4th.

Adding the practical version: buy small from anyone new, test it, then decide.

replysharereportpermalink
u/blunt_coldbox_20241 point·1 year ago

no batch number, no date, no method — that is the pattern, not one detail

replysharereportpermalink
u/milos_vestergaard67 points·1 year ago

Small fix — the name you are describing is in the wider-market table with almost nothing on file, not in the documented twenty.

Disagreeing here: that is a delay, and this board has to keep delay and intent in separate columns.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.