[Confirmed] recycled COA PDF — same producer string, same timestamp, three vendors
recycled COA PDF — same producer string, same timestamp, three vendors. Multiple orders, one buyer, which makes this a series and not a survey.
Lost money once, years ago, to a shop that pushed hard for a decision the same day. Every time I see that pressure now I close the tab.
Was in a group buy that went quiet for six weeks. It resolved in the end, but the structure meant I had no visibility and no recourse the whole time.
Asked a new shop for a batch-specific certificate before ordering. The reply was a generic catalogue page. I did not order.
Please do not ask me what dose you should be on. I genuinely do not know and neither does anyone else here.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Cosigning the domain check. Character by character, every time, and paste it rather than typing it.
Cosigning the domain check.
stubborn_batchlist_pls has the group-buy risk right — it is structural, not a judgement about anybody in particular.
stubborn_batchlist_pls has the group-buy risk right — it is structural, not a judgement about anybody in particular.
Agreed. Dates and documents make a report. Adjectives make a thread.
group buys concentrate risk in one person and nobody plans for that
Reported something here with dates and screenshots and was asked for the document trail. Fair challenge, and it made the report worth reading.
Cloned storefronts copy assets, layout and testimonial text. What they cannot easily copy is a batch-specific document that ties to a lot you can then have tested independently.
Push back: "nobody has tested them" is a fact about this board, not a fact about the company. Say the first one.
Merged into the standing thread for that domain so the reports sit in one place.
ask for a batch-specific document before you send anything