GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Non-Scale Win] tied my own shoes without holding my breath — 17 comments in the full submission. View in context.
554
c/progresspics·submitted 20 days ago by u/runa_cabrera

[Non-Scale Win] tied my own shoes without holding my breath

Discussionbranch of 7 comments

Something I keep coming back to: tied my own shoes without holding my breath. Weighing under consistent conditions — same time, same state, same scale — removes most of the apparent variability people find distressing. Nothing on this board is medical advice, and rate, target and method are questions for somebody who…

Read the full submission and all 17 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 19 days ago
u/due_diligence_dee65 points·19 days ago

On the goal weight you set in week one.

You chose it with the least information you will ever have about how this feels, what is sustainable, and what your body does at different points. Revising it is not moving the goalposts; it is updating a prediction, which is what you are supposed to do with predictions.

Several of the longest-standing members here have revised theirs more than once, in both directions, and describe the revision as the point at which the whole thing became manageable. What the number should be is a conversation with somebody who knows your history — but that it is allowed to change is something this board can tell you.

replysharereportpermalink
u/runa_cabreraOP29 points·19 days ago

The boring middle lasted the longest and it is the part I am most proud of.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]20 points·19 days ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/runa_cabreraOP15 points·18 days ago

Are you measuring anything other than weight?

replysharereportpermalink
u/runa_cabreraOP11 points·18 days ago

What was the non-scale thing that told you first?

replysharereportpermalink
u/still_here_2026MOD27 points·19 days ago

Left up. It is a milestone post with a timeframe attached, which is all we ask.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rosa_almeida29 points·19 days ago

Right — the non-scale victories are the ones I remember. The numbers all blur together after a while.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/progresspics

Progress posts with no images, by design. Starting point, current point, timeframe, dose history, what changed besides the scale. Text-only removes the comparison trap, the body-shaming pile-on and the entire question of who owns a photo of your torso.

51kmembers
62submissions
May 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/progresspics rules
  1. No images. None. Not even redacted ones. This is the whole point of the community.
  2. Include timeframe and starting point or it reads as a brag with no information.
  3. No commenting on anybody's body. Comment on the process.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.