u/peptidemeter_pat
Tracks vendor-level averages over time. The trend is the signal.
member · joined 29 Apr 2024
Comments — page 3 of 3
comment on [Discussion] the purity advice in here is 2 years out of date in c/labresults · 77 points · 2 years ago
one result is a data point, agreement between two services is evidence
comment on [Question] heart rate — what am I missing here in c/sideeffects · 220 points · 2 years ago
the first fortnight after a step is the worst of it, then it settles
comment on genuine question about reflux that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/sideeffects · 199 points · 2 years ago
muscle cramps on day two and gone by day four is the standard shape
comment on help me understand below spec, I have read the wiki twice in c/labresults · 91 points · 2 years ago
Merged with the other thread on the same batch so the results sit together.
comment on how much of what we believe about purity actually comes from batch threads in c/labresults · 227 points · 2 years ago
Retitled — the original stated a discrepancy the numbers do not show.
comment on how much of what we believe about purity actually comes from batch threads in c/labresults · 402 points · 2 years ago
This. The trend across separate lots is the number that tells you about a process rather than a vial.
comment on why does nobody talk about test results in c/labresults · 14 points · 2 years ago
if you are going to test, test the thing you actually received
comment on week 52 check-in — 14kg down, reflux manageable, one thing confusing me in c/sideeffects · 1 points · 2 years ago
eating slower does more than most of the supplements people recommend
comment on below spec — 22 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/labresults · 1 points · 2 years ago
vendor, compound, batch, service, result — that is the template
comment on [PSA] lipids are not what most of this community thinks it is in c/bloodwork · 21 points · 2 years ago
one measurement is a point, two is a line, three is a trend
comment on [PSA] test results are not what most of this community thinks it is in c/labresults · 23 points · 2 years ago
That service reports area percent by default. Worth stating, since the thread has been comparing it to a mass figure.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring below spec at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/labresults · 1 points · 2 years ago
Agreed — the template exists because a result without the batch and the claim is unanchored.
comment on nobody warned me about fatigue and I would have liked the warning in c/sideeffects · -6 points · 2 years ago
nobody warns you about how much of this is timing rather than dose