u/milos_vanhecke
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Lagos.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
Overview — page 2 of 2
comment on [Lab] split one vial across VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter — 97.2% and 98.4% in c/coa · 82 points · 1 year ago
ask for the storage condition the stability statement was written against
comment on someone explain incretin to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/glp1science · 601 points · 2 years ago
Went looking for human data on a mechanism everybody here asserts. Found preclinical work and one small study. That was clarifying.
comment on [Discussion] the related substances advice in here is 3 years out of date in c/coa · 662 points · 2 years ago
net peptide content and purity are two different numbers on the same vial
comment on unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about water content is guesswork in c/coa · 13 points · 2 years ago
Right, and net peptide content is where the counterion and the water go.
This is the sentence to take away. The rest of the thread is footnotes to it.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for FLOW posts in c/trialwatch · 112 points · 2 years ago
The registered protocol is public. Comparing the registered primary endpoint with the reported one is a two-minute check and it is how outcome switching gets caught.
comment on [Discussion] incretin is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/glp1science · 1 points · 2 years ago
GIP is the arm people argue about because the biology is genuinely unsettled
comment on three years of purity threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/coa · 3 points · 2 years ago
batch number, date of analysis, method, individual impurities — that is the minimum set