GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
HE

u/heart_rate_bump

Resting HR up 6bpm on titration, back down at maintenance. n=1, tracked daily.

member · joined 30 Apr 2024

12,543post karma
6,673comment karma
7submissions
101comments

Comments — page 3 of 3

comment on hazard ratio is the most under-discussed thing on this board in c/trialwatch · 0 points · 1 year ago

Same.

Adding the check nobody runs — the registered protocol is public and takes two minutes to compare.

permalink

comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about MHRA until somebody posts a number in c/glp1uk · 348 points · 1 year ago

Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have their own arrangements. An answer that begins with "in England" should say so, and most of the confusion here comes from answers that do not.

permalink

comment on glucagon is the most under-discussed thing on this board in c/survodutide · 160 points · 1 year ago

Which endpoint — histological response, fibrosis improvement, or fat fraction?

permalink

comment on reading SURMOUNT threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/trialwatch · 371 points · 1 year ago

SELECT was cardiovascular outcomes, not weight

permalink

comment on [Discussion] we are measuring research peptides at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/researchpeptides · 16 points · 1 year ago

Identity confirmed, or purity only?

Adding the practical question — stocked or made to order, and what is the lead time.

permalink

comment on glucagon: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/retatrutide · 3 points · 1 year ago

the phase 2 numbers were striking and they were also 48 weeks in a small population

Agreed, and the glucagon arm is exactly why the comparison threads do not work.

permalink

comment on reading eGFR threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/bloodwork · 21 points · 1 year ago

nothing on this board interprets your results for you

permalink

comment on stalled for 7 weeks at 10mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/retatrutide · 7 points · 2 years ago

Small fix — three receptors, not two. GLP-1, GIP and glucagon, and the third one is the reason this compound gets its own board.

permalink

comment on nobody warned me about reflux and I would have liked the warning in c/bloodwork · 1 points · 2 years ago

Same lab as the previous draw?

permalink

comment on why does nobody talk about MASH in c/survodutide · 1 points · 2 years ago

Right, and the trial titration was slow for reasons that are visible in the tolerability tables.

permalink

comment on why does nobody talk about MASH in c/survodutide · 37 points · 2 years ago

Imaging-derived liver fat fraction is a surrogate. It correlates with histology imperfectly, and a trial reporting one is not reporting the other.

permalink

comment on anyone else notice glucagon kicking in around week 47 in c/survodutide · 35 points · 2 years ago

Independent purity results for this compound are very sparse across the whole site, which means any impression about consistency is built on almost nothing.

permalink

comment on the baseline labs question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/bloodwork · 16 points · 2 years ago

Panicked about a single result, posted here, got told to repeat it, repeated it, and it was fine.

permalink

comment on reading SURMOUNT threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/trialwatch · 190 points · 2 years ago

phase 2 finds a dose, phase 3 measures the effect

permalink

comment on unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about hazard ratio is guesswork in c/trialwatch · 139 points · 2 years ago

FLOW was kidney outcomes and it is the one nobody quotes

permalink

comment on anyone else notice baseline labs kicking in around week 7 in c/bloodwork · 89 points · 2 years ago

Careful — that is a question for whoever ordered the panel, and nobody in this thread can answer it responsibly.

permalink

comment on [PSA] lipids are not what most of this community thinks it is in c/bloodwork · 82 points · 2 years ago

Not convinced by the attribution. Weight loss alone moves that marker and you have no way to separate the two.

permalink

comment on [Results] 45 weeks on 10mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/retatrutide · 7 points · 2 years ago

small trial, big effect, wide error bars

permalink

comment on anyone else notice dose escalation kicking in around week 37 in c/retatrutide · 33 points · 2 years ago

Is that the 48-week figure or an earlier readout?

permalink

comment on anyone else notice dose escalation kicking in around week 37 in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 2 years ago

Watched heart rate on a wearable across twelve weeks because the threads said to. It moved a little and I have no idea whether that means anything.

permalink

comment on anyone else notice dose escalation kicking in around week 37 in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 2 years ago

What do you think the glucagon component is adding, specifically?

permalink

Trophy case
Top Contributor Answered the Question
Cake day 30 Apr 2024
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
Where they post
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.