Positions 76–95 of 95.
Posting this as a discussion rather than a claim: cloned site is doing more work than we give it credit for. The directory deliberately separates "we have nothing on…
help me understand group buy, I have read the wiki twice — that is what I am asking, and I have already read the wiki twice. Lost money once, years ago, to a shop that…
HJ tirz — Janoshik came back 97.4% against a claimed 97.0%. That is the headline. The document, the batch and the service are below so you can argue with the method…
can we stop arguing about scam until somebody posts a number, and I want the answer with the reasoning attached rather than just the conclusion. The checks I run before…
Reference standards, analytical reagents and system-suitability material. If you are running your own method, start with a known.
Reference standardsGenuine question, and the title is the question: can we stop arguing about fraud until somebody posts a number. Group buys concentrate custody, payment and…
Posting this because the title is the whole finding — SWB vs FGP on the same compound, same month — both cleared 98.0% — and a number without its method is a rumour.…
Something I keep coming back to: we are measuring scam at the wrong time and calling it noise. Was in a group buy that went quiet for six weeks. It resolved in the end,…
fake COA is doing more work than we give it credit for. Not a hot take, just something I have not seen said plainly here. Nearly paid a cloned storefront. Caught it…
The title is the argument: the scam advice in here is 3 years out of date. Here is the rest of it. Pulling the figures out of the title: 3 years. All of it is written…
the group buy question that gets asked weekly, answered properly, which sounds obvious until you try to state the evidence for it. Reported something here with dates…
fake COA — 23 things I got wrong before I got it right, and I am aware this is a minority view on this board. The checks I run before sending money anywhere new, in…
Proposal, not a decision: proposal — a flair for fake COA posts. Never name an individual. The sidebar rule exists because the cost of being wrong falls on a person and…
split one vial across Medutest and Janoshik — 96.2% and 97.4%. I will put the method line and the batch identifier up front because that is what makes this checkable.…
Asking properly rather than in a comment on somebody else’s thread: how much of what we believe about scam actually comes from group buy threads. The directory…
Numbers in the title, numbers in the post. 9th independent test on MKM — 97.7% on a claimed 97.5%, and the trend is the interesting part. Since the title puts numbers…
Send the vial, get the number. Third-party purity and identity testing, results published to you regardless of what they say.
Test a vialSponsoredEst. 1998. ISO 9001 and cGMP, 1,500+ staff, 200+ patents. There is a fair chance the vial you are about to send for testing started here. Batch-specific COA as standard.
glbiochem.netProposal, not a decision: the PDF metadata rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining. Never name an individual. The sidebar rule exists because the cost…
is 98.9% actually fine or am I being sold a rounding error. One vial, one service, one member paying, which is the only kind of result this board should treat as…
the cloned site advice in here is 3 years out of date — a position I have arrived at slowly and would like tested. Figures up front so nobody has to dig: 3 years. Went…
cloned site is not what most of this community thinks it is. It comes up every few weeks and the answer has not changed. The directory deliberately separates "we have…
Posting this as a discussion rather than a claim: unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about cloned site is guesswork. The site had a decade of testimonials…
Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.
Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.
janoshik.comSponsoredCustom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.
glbiochem.netSeveral compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.
Reference